Search for: "Hamilton v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
When former Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) Member of Parliament, Helena Guergis, filed a claim yesterday against Prime Minister Harper and the CPC at the Ontario Superior Court, the story made headlines. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:10 am
Recently, the Superior Court of Justice heard an appeal by the farmer of the second Commission decision. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The district court (Judge Hamilton) granted the defendant's summary judgment motion and dismissed the action for lack of standing. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am by Marie Louise
MP3tunes LLC (IP Whiteboard)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Boy Racer – P2P lawyer: IP address not enough, let me search all PCs in the house – Boy Racer v Doe (ArsTechnica) Cinetel Films – Anti-piracy lawyers retreat, drop another mass bittorrent lawsuit (TorrentFreak) On the Cheap – Lawyer refuses to tell court how profitable BitTorrent settlements are (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak)   [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:20 am by Alham Chelehmalzadeh
Denis Vranich, Elixir and Paradise Lane Developments Hamilton Inc. court decision was released on January 28, 2011 by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Hamilton. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Michael O'Brien
Under the California State Constitution, an original habeas petition can be filed in either the a California county Superior Court, California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:42 am by S2KM Limited
See, for example, Rule 68.2 and Rule 68.3 of the Local Rules for the Hamilton County, Ohio Probate Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
  On the anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
The Divisional Court ordered that the following two questions be tried as preliminary issues: first, whether the designation of the Upper Tribunal as a “superior court of record” of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 3(5) meant that its decisions were not amenable to the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court; and, secondly, whether the decision which Mr Cart sought to challenge was amenable to judicial review. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:33 pm by admin
Furthermore, in an old Manitoba Court of Appeal case (New Method Cleaners & Launderers Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
The Court found that the superior court therefore exceeded the scope of its review when reversing under these circumstances. [read post]