Search for: "Hardy v. Mays"
Results 141 - 160
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In the recent decision in the case of Hardy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
Because they have fewer potentially relevant ads to choose from, the search engines are unable to display information that they believe may be relevant and useful to consumers. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
The hardy duo of returning relists are joined this week by four new hopefuls. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Summary of conclusions reached 5‑year prescription: awareness of loss, sections 11(3) and 6(4) [5] While it is possible that losses which were easily identifiable by HC may have occurred in 2007, leading to the triggering of the 5‑year prescription in 2007 (i.e. more than five years before the actions were raised in 2014: see paragraphs [58] to [61] below), this is a matter of dispute which cannot be resolved on the… [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
But you know the sort of thing : carbolic smoke ball tea-towels, unfunny cufflinks, inappropriate gavels and other assorted accessories of pompous try-hardiness. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:57 am
If they are seeking the trademark owner–and only the trademark owner–then competitive keyword advertisers may encroach on the trademark owner’s goodwill and “steal” the trademark owner’s customers (and the search engine/ad network may be profiting from this “theft”). [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:35 am
Judge Posner’s complaint about Justice Scalia’s hypocrisy in joining the flag-burning opinion in Texas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Sedar v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:56 am
The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland addressed the issue of causation in a recent medical malpractice action, Hardy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Hardy, 347 P.3d 222, 228 (Kan. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Hardy, 347 P.3d 222, 228 (Kan. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
I blogged in May about Teixeira v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
Similarly, keyword advertising: may be strong evidence of a desire to compete with plaintiff in the marketplace. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm
Subsequently, in May 2015, the court appointed a provisional liquidator. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
For example, our Advertising and Marketing Law casebook covers the FTC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:48 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:14 pm
In the case of Hardie v Herald and Weekly Times ([2016] VSCA 103), the plaintiff, Ms Raelene Hardie, was a part owner and manager of a strip club in rural Victoria called “Club Rawhide”. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:34 pm
The panel will also review the recent Federal Circuit decision in Enfish v. [read post]
