Search for: "Harmon v. Long" Results 141 - 160 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am by Ben
YouTube has gone on to acknowledge that in the short run, this might result in a lot more videos being blocked, however it is pragmatically focussing on the long term impacts. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Following an Advocate General's opinion in January this year, the CJEU were now tasked with clarifying this issue, and handed down their decision not too long ago.As a very brief primer, the case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerned the publication of confidential military reports by Funken online by the daily newspaper Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (having obtained them through unknown means). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Following an Advocate General's opinion in January this year, the CJEU were now tasked with clarifying this issue, and handed down their decision not too long ago.As a very brief primer, the case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerned the publication of confidential military reports by Funken online by the daily newspaper Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (having obtained them through unknown means). [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
They believed federal law supported their case.In a 1978 decision that reverberated across Indian country and beyond, the Supreme Court struck a blow to their efforts by ruling in Oliphant v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am by Ben
Also, Nike does not claim any ownership over this initial rough design, rather merely on the final refined version.CASE Act passed by the Senate Judiciary CommitteeAs had been reported by PetaPixel, the long awaited CASE Act has been passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee - if passed, the bill will  go on to establish a small claims court for Copyright Infringement cases in the USA. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
  The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Open micJanis Pilch, Rutgers U: domestically it seems obvious that litigation on 512 can’t change the systemic problem of infringement and the impossibility for most rightsholders to litigate. 512 sets up a permanent conflict b/t service providers and rightsholders. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]