Search for: "Harms v. IRS" Results 141 - 160 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2007, 9:06 am
The general perception in the legal community has been that they are tax free, a dangerous and incorrect perception post Murphy v IRS and there was no shortage of settlement brokers angling to write these cases on the false promise that they could be done so income tax free and under the protective umbrella of section 104 and section 130. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm by Michael Grossman
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nkansah, 699 F.3d 743 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding intent to harm is necessary); United States v. [read post]