Search for: "Head v. State of Indiana"
Results 141 - 160
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
Sherman, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - State of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 1:54 pm
"Recall however that Indiana's Wicca case, as stated in the Court of Appeals opinion, Thomas E. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:05 am
In Perez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
In this case, Bridget Pavese fell on the job and received medical treatment for a head injury. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Indiana [proposed] (a) Marriage in Indiana consists only of the union of one man and one woman. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:57 am
This week's oral arguments before the Court of Appeals that will NOT be webcast: This Monday, Oct. 22nd: 1:00 PM - State of Indiana v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:03 pm
Burke v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
When Indiana eliminated forced payment of fair share fees, public-sector unions in the state lost 91 percent of their membership. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm
State of Indiana – Chicago lawyer Jason Stiehl of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets Sunshine backed bonds – time to look on the sunny side? [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
Shortly thereafter, Barnhart crashed head-on into Appellant Pamela Argabrite’s vehicle at a nearby intersection. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:28 am
Carter v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:59 pm
Halbig v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
If a new rule is procedural, then Teague rears its ugly head. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Nick Sibilla urges the justices to resolve the question whether the Constitution’s excessive-fines clause applies to the states by reviewing a case in which “the Indiana Supreme Court … ordered [a defendant] to forfeit his $40,000 Land Rover because he sold $385 worth of drugs. [read post]
