Search for: "Health & Welfare v. Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 10:37 am by Lyle Denniston
Is the ACA’s requirement that virtually every adult American obtain health insurance by the year 2014 unconstitutional, as beyond Congress’s power, either under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause or its taxing power under the General Welfare Clause? [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
An employer determining that an individual with an actual, perceived or record of disability should be prepared to show that this determination was made either without regard to the individual’s disability or that the individual does not qualify even with reasonable accommodation, that accommodation would be unreasonably costly, or accommodation could not eliminate the safety or other proven barriers to qualification of the individual for the position. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm by Howard Bye-Torre and Claire Rowland
  For example, Obergefell arguably does not require non-governmental employers to provide same-sex spouse benefits in self-funded health and welfare benefit plans, including health flexible savings accounts, even if benefits are provided to opposite-sex spouses. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am by Maya Angenot
Vallee rendered judgment in Nakhuda v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Governor Greg Abbott’s recent directive ordering the child welfare agency to investigate all gender-affirming care for trans children as child abuse is a particularly cruel example of this.A trial court in Texas has issued a temporary restraining order that prevents Abbott and his lackeys from acting on the order (Doe v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm by Holly Brezee
The test hinged on whether the individual (1) had a consensual relationship with the tribe; or (2) whether the individual’s conduct threatened the political or economic integrity of the tribe, or health and welfare of its members. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 12:04 pm
Meal periods are "designed to protect individual employees," "address some of ‘the most basic demands of an employee's health and welfare' [citation]," and Labor Code § 219(a) makes them "plainly nonnegotiable. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:06 am by Mark Wortman
It also states that parents should both have input into “decisions affecting the health, education and welfare of their children” whenever possible. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]