Search for: "Henkels "
Results 141 - 160
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2008, 6:49 am
Leonard, Henkel Family Endowed Chair, Shenandoah University"This rich volume is a rich empirical account of how and why the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes are penalized....It draws upon an astounding breadth and depth of literature not only from international criminal law theory and practice but also from the realms of sociology, philosophy, and political theory........Drumbl's work will become essential reading for all those… [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Henkel (1901) with respect to Cuba, which it found not to be part of the United States, although then under U.S. occupation, because there had been no formal acquisition and the occupation was understood to be temporary. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:26 am
. ($3.645 million) Henkel National Adhesives ($2.792 million) Gadge USA, Inc. ($2.763 million) Neenah Paper Inc. ($2.740 million) As expected from the falling financial results, the company has been at risk of defaulting on or in default of its secured credit facilities - which consists of a $75 million term loan, a $35 million term loan and a $120 million revolving credit facility - since late 2007. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 76 (1906). [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:16 am
")Under this backdrop, EU scholars Joachim Henkel and Florian Jell looked at the German model to determine how, and how often, German patent filers avail themselves of defensive patent filings, and their motivations for doing so. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
Henkel in 1901, and followed from the Court’s constitutional analysis in Baldwin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In Bongrain SA’s Trade Mark Application [2004] EWCA Civ 1690 at [26]-[28], Jacobs LJ had, interpreting various European case law including Joined Cases C-456/01P and C-457/01 P Henkel v OHIM EU:C:2004:258, rejected the idea that a “fancy” or unusual shape of goods would automatically be taken by the public as a trade mark denoting trade origin. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:38 am
An early draft of a study by two Munich-based academics, Professor Joachim Henkel and Ph.D. candidate Hans Zischka, says it all in its headline: "Why most patents are invalid -- Extent, reasons, and potential remedies of patent validity" Highly recommended reading. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 76 (1906). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Henkel, the Supreme Court interpreted the provision broadly to include “any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful function of any department of government. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:27 am
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906), the Supreme Court held that corporations and other artificial entities do not have a 5th Amendment privilege they are “creatures of the State’ with powers that are limited by the state. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
– SKARB KIBICA trade mark dispute(Class 46) Similarity of signs, homogenity of goods – ALT ATLANTIC word-figurative mark case (Class 46) The average consumers’ confusion – ALFOFARM TM dispute(Class 46) South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal confirms territoriality of IP rights in Gallo Africa v Sting Music (Afro-IP) Seeing Red: colour marks case Henkel AG v Trefoil Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (Afro-IP) Spain Hints on how to calculate the… [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
This interpretation seems to align well with earlier decisions by the Court, according to which the special head of jurisdiction in Art 16(1) Brussels I is only available personally to the consumer who is party to the consumer contract in question (Case C-89/91 Shearson Lehman Hutton, [23]; Case C-167/00 Henkel), [33]), and according to which the assignment of a claim does not affect international jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation (Case C-352/13 CDC Hydrogene Peroxide,… [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:22 pm
Many thanks to Polina Pavlova for sharing her comments on this recent ECJ ruling, first in our (MPI) weekly Referentenrunde and now here. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:01 am
"'The net is wider," agreed psychologist Gerald Henkel-Johnson of Esko, who has done violence risk assessments for the courts for 13 years.Judges' decisions are made even more difficult by the MSOP's track record. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
” Henkel v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
By Hal WegnerBefore an overflow hearing room on an internationally available web broadcast, Chairman Howard Berman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee relevant to patents hosted a most informative and candid hearing yesterday afternoon joined by roughly ten of his committee colleagues, including Rep. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(EPLAW) Nigeria Keeping track without requiring registration, a new approach in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Poland Trade marks and taxes in Poland (Class 46) The reputation of a trade mark (Class 46) Polish Supreme Court speaks on reputation and criteria for trade mark infringement: Technopol Publishing Agency v Phoenix Press and Bauer Publishing House(Class 46) Romania New Romanian mandatory mediation to help settle TM disputes (Class 46) South Africa Single colour difficulties… [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Comment: Despite the confusion engendered by these various plurality opinions, Glidden and Pilkington helped to “decalifornicate” the California Supreme Court’s Henkel analysis and gave mainstream credibility to insurer arguments that successor entities were not entitled to coverage under their predecessors’ policies “by operation of law. [read post]
