Search for: "Hernandez v. I. N. S" Results 141 - 160 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was because the Constitution conferred jurisdiction upon the High Court ‘[i]n all matters … in which the Commonwealth, or a person suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth, is a party’. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Supp.2d 1285, 1287 (D.N.M. 2005); Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Supp.2d 1285, 1287 (D.N.M. 2005); Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Supp.2d 1285, 1287 (D.N.M. 2005); Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Supp.2d 1285, 1287 (D.N.M. 2005); Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 9:45 pm
Montoya De Hernandez from 1985 left open the question whether reasonable suspicion was required for intensive border searches of the person, including strip and body cavity searches (n. 4: “It is also important to note what we do not hold. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 7:01 am
My family and I were living in Spain when it occurred; my views on it were aired in a Weekly Standard article. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316, 333 n.6 (en banc) (4th Cir. 2004), vacated and remanded, 543 U.S. 1097, 125 S. [read post]