Search for: "Hike v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2017, 12:59 pm
”)United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
OIR ultimately approved a 14.5% rate hike. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
Following the Florida Supreme Court’s April, 2016 decision in Castellanos v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:41 pm
See, People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 6:57 am
Hormel & Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:05 am
., hiking, swimming, running races, etc. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 5:55 pm
Wage hike for hotel workers. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 5:24 am
Additional Resources: Woody v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:20 am
Days after the sixth episode of FX’s new documentary about The People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
"The DJ's Top Verdicts supplement includes Mallano v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm
Nothing much happened until 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:27 am
Additional Resources: Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am
California, supra; United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:47 am
If oral argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:44 pm
Technical Explanation of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015, House Amendment #2 to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 2029 (Rules Committee Print 114-40), Joint Committee on Taxation, JCX-144-15, December 17, 2015. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
His interpretation of the Annex contradicts the most basic cannon of treaty interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, which states in Article 31 that “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
The Brady rule resulted from a 1963 Supreme Court case, aptly named Brady v. [read post]
