Search for: "Hines v Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm by NL
London Borough of Haringey v Hines [2010] EWCA Civ 1111 Ms Hines had purchased a property under the right to buy from Haringey in 2002. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm by NL
London Borough of Haringey v Hines [2010] EWCA Civ 1111 Ms Hines had purchased a property under the right to buy from Haringey in 2002. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm by Rick Hills
"Immigration is Different": The easiest way to distinguish the cases is to invoke the old Hines v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:18 am by Peter Spiro
  As for Judge Bolton’s reasoning in her order invalidating key provisions of the law, it is striking how much work Hines v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:55 pm by Adam Thierer
Judge Richard Posner used similar logic when penning the 7th Circuit’s 2001 decision in American Amusement Machine Association v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
I have expressed my unhappiness with Hines before (People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 273 [2004] [R. [read post]
And so does the empirical evidence of supreme pro-defendant bias cited to in the doomed motion to recuse in the case, which is at the core of the informed public's lack of confidence in the Court.Hopefully Justice O'Neill's bold jurisprudence in dissent will add to the public debate over the legal and political role of the Texas Supreme Court and the wisdom of the Chief's idea to end the current judicial selection system and replace it with one that puts constraints on… [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:48 am
Daniel Hines’ luck finally runs out. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 11:56 pm
" People v Hines, 97 NY2d at 61.Subsequently, as discussed in detail here, the Court of Appeals, relying on Hines has held in People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, that a defendant's legal sufficiency arguments are not properly preserved for appellate review unless a motion for a trial order of dismissal is renewed at the close of all proof:After defendant presented his own evidence, he did not renew his earlier argument. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 10:44 am
There the worker for Hines Lumber was regularly required to work mandatory 10 hour days, for 6 days a week, as a condition of his regular employment. [read post]