Search for: "Hogan v. Long"
Results 141 - 160
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
The Supreme Court has clung to its long-standing opposition to cameras despite a steady but generally low-intensity campaign to change its mind. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am
Consider the $140 million awarded to Hulk Hogan in the Gawker litigation. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
Last week in the Courts The damages only trial in the case of White v Express Newspapers began before Mitting J on 7 March 2016 but was settled on 8 March 2016 with the defendant agreeing to pay a “substantial” sum in damages. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Appx. 70, 71-72 (2d Cir. 2012); Hogan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
Hogan (1982).) [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
E.g., from Hogan Lovells: “[I]f generative AI software has been fed or trained using private data (such as a proprietary provider or user database) the agreement should explicitly define ownership of such data. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
United States Gawker Media has filed for bankruptcy after losing the Hulk Hogan invasion-of-privacy case. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 11:41 pm
Post-Sisvel v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
Hogan & Hartson, LLP, 230 P.3d 1275, 1282 (Colo. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
. #3: Hulk Hogan/Gawker/Peter Thiel. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:38 am
So far, three Nokia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
History plays a role: SCt has gone back to historical sources for patent law, e.g., Impressions v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
| Brent takes a tumble, trade marks invalidated for being descriptiveNever Too Late 209 [Week ending 16 Dec] BREAKING: AG Szpunar advises CJEU to rule that unlicensed sampling MAY be a copyright infringement and German free use may be contrary to EU law | The AG Opinion in Metall auf Metall: it's not a fundamental rights violation to say that sampling requires a licence | AG Hogan advises CJEU to rule that German press publishers' right is unenforceable | EU Copyright… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:53 pm
With a delay of a few days due to a busy schedule and other circumstances I now finally find the time to report on a Huawei v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
In Case C-432/18 Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH, Advocate General Hogan has advised the Court of Justice to rule that the terms "Aceto", "Balsamico" and "Aceto Balsamico" should not qualify for protection as Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs) under Regulation No. 1151/2012. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:13 am
Solicitors are now having to get to grips with the possibility of clients claiming back success fees following Herbert v HH Law, the growing dominance of fixed costs and the shambles of QOCS – the topic which is covered in this recent post –http://costsbarrister.co.uk/access-to-justice/extending-qocs/Andrew Hogan has long been a leading authority on costs issues and this blog is a must.5. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
The 1709 Blog is delighted to host the following reflections by friend Federica Pezza (Hogan Lovells) on films, subtitles and ... copyright (what else?). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:43 am
Only if a defendant denies, further analysis will be performed, and further proof will be required from the plaintiff.The need for defendants in Germany to deny an infringement allegation is also going to be a key issue at a Microsoft v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:38 pm
In one recent case, Bollea v. [read post]
