Search for: "Holland v. State of Florida*"
Results 141 - 160
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm
Most other states in the country ban gay marriage too, so domestic partnerships in those states are important in the same way they are in Florida. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 12:47 pm
Holland v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am
The court backpedaled from that a bit last year in Holland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:09 am
According to the original Complaint, RealTimeBid.Com, LLC (`RTB’) is a limited liability company duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ohio, having its principal place of business in Holland, Ohio. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
Indeed, Holland and other leading Southerners made the Twenty-Fourth Amendment central to their constitutional case against the Voting Rights Act of 1965 – arguing that some of its sweeping provisions, most notably a ban on poll taxes in state and local elections, were unconstitutional without the enactment of another formal amendment. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
The other day I talked about the decision in Holland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Tatjana V. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am
And the Supreme Court shouldn't stick its nose into states' rules that would put a man to death without review because a law office, even one with as much mahogany and marble as Sullivan & Cromwell, screwed up.Justice Scalia made the point more clearly in Holland v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:34 am
See Gilbert v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
See Gitter v Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2d Cir.); Feder v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
