Search for: "Hollingsworth v. Perry"
Results 141 - 160
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
Windsor (PDF link to opinion) and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:25 pm
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 9th Circuit, California, Gay, Gay Marriage, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
Perry et. al. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Additionally, the High Court dismissed the companion same-sex marriage case, Hollingsworth v Perry, holding that the proponents of California’s “Proposition 8,” which amended the state constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, lacked standing to appeal a federal district court’s ruling that the ballot initiative was unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Perry - The Prop 8 Case First, let's look at Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
The second case was Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
Am I the only one who thinks all nine justices collectively wrote both opinions in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
United States, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Because of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:18 pm
By Hilary Lamar The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
They are-Hollingsworth v Perry (rejecting an appeal of the lower court decision overturning California's Proposition 8, on technical jurisdictional grounds), and US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
See Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Perry, John Roberts, LGBT, Marriage, Maryland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
The opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
