Search for: "Hopkins v. Securities " Results 141 - 160 of 254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes & Anor; Richborough Estate Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council, heard 22 and 23 Feb 2017. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
blog on Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters From the Law Society Gazette on Harrath v Stand for Peace From Scottish Legal News and Shoosmiths on Monroe v Hopkins   Internet and Social Media Socially Aware have published a post listing some of the most significant social media news stories from the week. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes & Anor; Richborough Estate Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council, heard 22 and 23 Feb 2017. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J handed down a judgment dealing with permission to appeal in the case of Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 645 (QB). [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
There was an interview with Katie Hopkins in the Evening Standard. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial of Monroe v Hopkins was heard on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, 27 and 28 February and 1 March 2017. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Suffolk Coatal District Council v Hopkins Homes & Anor; Richborough Estate Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council, heard 22 and 23 Feb 2017. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
Though there is an interesting decision on the legal test of the consultation – procedural unfairness must be such that “there has been a procedural unfairness which materially prejudiced the applicant” (via Hopkins Developments Limited v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] PTSR 1145 ), rather than simply a technical flaw. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:30 pm by Ron Friedmann
About HighQ HighQ describes itself as a “suite of cloud-based software products combine cutting-edge technology with enterprise grade security, all wrapped up in a consumer-style interface, to help businesses collaborate, communicate and securely share information. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
With just nine months left in office, this trip may be the president’s last chance to secure his foreign policy legacy in the region. [read post]
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72  (Case Comment here). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
In Al Rawi (Al Rawi & Ors v The Security Service & Ors [2011] UKSC 34) and Tariq (Home Office v Tariq [2011] UKSC 35), we considered how far at common law one can devise secret court procedures and we held that there is no general common law power to conduct civil proceedings in secret where one party doesn’t know the material which is being put before the court. [read post]