Search for: "House v. Clark"
Results 141 - 160
of 874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:21 am
Clarke v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Lord Clarke repeated a useful quotation of Longmore LJ from Barclays Bank plc v HHY Luxembourg SARL [2010] EWCA Civ 1248: “If a clause is capable of two meanings…it is quite possible that neither meaning will flout common sense. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
Clark. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
Downing Street has supported May and there is speculation that Clarke may lose his job in an upcoming cabinet reshuffle. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
Downing Street has supported May and there is speculation that Clarke may lose his job in an upcoming cabinet reshuffle. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
Guest Post by Professor Tomás Gómez-Arostegui (Lewis & Clark Law School) One of the questions in Impression Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
Clark, June 18, 2015, 9-0 on the judgment, two dissenting votes on the main issue and one hard to classify vote. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
Laws LJ explained why in Marshalls Clay Products Ltd v Caulfield, Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd [2004] ICR 1502 at [32]: The rules of precedent or stare decisis cognisable here are given by the common law . . . [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:12 am
Supreme Court issued a decision in Chaidez v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
” His Lordship’s approach to construction was premised in part on Lord Clarke JSC’s summary of the relevant principles in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, paras 14-30. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html Corey Lee Dove v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
Brietta Clark is a professor of law and J. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Clark v Manchester City Council [2015] UKUT 129 (LC) Mr Clark had a licence for an HMO for not more than 5 occupants. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
” Lords Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes In Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2017] UKSC 36 the appellant, Ms Poshteh, lost her appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
