Search for: "Humane Society of the United States v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 2,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 11:47 am by Sherry F. Colb
Remember learning at oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Immigration The Law Society Gazette has welcomed the government’s decision to provide legal aid for immigrants suffering domestic violence. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:44 am by Paul Horwitz
 Proportionality strikes me as worth considering in preference to the arid absolutism that seems to have taken hold of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
In a prior post I noted the upcoming Second Annual United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights, of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, will be held in Geneva 2-4 December 2013. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am by CMS
’[12] The Court of Appeal have stated that ‘where children are affected the state is subject to an obligation to relieve poverty if “necessary to allow family life to continue. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am by Annie Shiel
” Yet the publicly available version of the PPM makes no reference to the United States’ international human rights obligations, including to protect the right to life. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Beth Stephens
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]