Search for: "Huntington v. Huntington"
Results 141 - 160
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 6:19 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 6:07 am
In Citimortgage Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:55 am
In Calvo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 10:43 am
From Lathus v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 8:05 am
Rossi v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 8:05 am
Rossi v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:29 pm
However, conditions deemed unreasonable or improper may be annulled (see Matter of Rendely v Town of Huntington, 44 AD3d 864. 865, 843 N.Y.S.2d 668). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:33 pm
In Savoie v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:33 pm
In Savoie v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
” (Huntington Memorial Hospital v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Huntington Memorial Hospital, supra. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:14 am
Testimony by the appointing authority in a disciplinary actionDiMattina v LaBua, 262 AD2d 409One of the issues considered by the Appellate Division in the DiMattina case appeal concerned the fact that the appointing authority both preferred the charges filed against Thomas J. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:48 pm
Coalition v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:54 am
(Copsey v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
Further, the injuries alleged by the petitioners fell within the zone of interests to be protected by SEQRA (see Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods. v Town of Sardinia, 87 NY2d at 687; Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 772-775; Matter of Bloodgood v Town of Huntington, 58 AD3d 619, 621; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d at 94). [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
Further, the injuries alleged by the petitioners fell within the zone of interests to be protected by SEQRA (see Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods. v Town of Sardinia, 87 NY2d at 687; Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 772-775; Matter of Bloodgood v Town of Huntington, 58 AD3d 619, 621; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d at 94)." [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
Figgie Intl. v Town of Huntington, 203 AD2d 416, 418-419; but cf. 202 Devs. v Town of Haverstraw, 175 AD2d 473), and it is not before us now....Even if a property owner may claim vested rights in reliance on an unconditional final approval of a site plan, it is undisputed that the Planning Board never granted unconditional approval of the plaintiffs' site plan. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:26 am
If a defendant does not prevail on one, a claimant should expect the defendant will then pursue the other.The case is: Joseph v Villages at Huntington Home Owners Assn., Inc. [read post]
