Search for: "I - V BLACK " Results 141 - 160 of 7,688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2021, 4:42 am by David Oscar Markus
 BY ROY BLACK: David invited me to write a few words about my old friend Lee Bailey and at first I hesitated but decided I owed it to Lee to tell his story. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:43 am
  The decision from two weeks ago—a Friday—in LaBarre v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:39 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The New York Times [unpaywalled]: “Four in 10 illegal gun cases tracked by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives were involved in black market sales, including from shadow dealers who used a legal loophole to evade background checks, according to an analysis of firearms trafficking released on Thursday. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:01 am by Tom Smith
L.J. 83 (2006), Bernie Black (Northwestern) and I compared the ranking of law schools using U.S. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:51 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
This notion seemed particularly apt to me when I read the Supreme Court’s recent ERISA preemption decision in Gobeille v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:31 am by admin
v=UWH578nAasM From what I can see, this gentleman refused to talk to the police, which was his right. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:22 am
 Case T 420/14 Wine in Black GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Quinta do Noval-Vinhos, SA is a 21 May decision of the General Court of the European Union in a fascinating exercise in comparison of marks for identical goods.In June 2012 Wine in Black applied to register the words Wine in Black as a Community trade mark (CTM) for ‘alcoholic beverages, (except beers), in particular: wines,… [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 9:10 pm by Kay Morgan
On Friday, April 13, 2018, by avoiding black cats, ladders, and breaking mirrors, seven members of the Texas Supreme Court1 managed to issue a new, sixty-six page opinion in USAA Texas Lloyds Company v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:35 am
Last week, I blogged about the Supreme Court's opinion in Lewis v. [read post]