Search for: "I v. B" Results 141 - 160 of 27,484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
I discussed the self-execution and Catch-22 issues at stake here in greater detail in the amicus brief I filed in this case, together with the Cato Institute.The post Supreme Court Issues Narrow Takings Clause Ruling in DeVillier v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:19 am by Ronald Mann
ShareAs securities cases go, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:56 pm by Kenan Farrell
Circle City Broadcasting I, LLC d/b/a WISH-TV (SD 2/21/2024) – An initial pretrial conference is scheduled on May 8, 2024. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
RBKC argued i) On the face of it, Part 4 of the Equality Act 2010 applies. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 Just to be clear: I am not using the word "authority" in that sense. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
Antisemitism and French criminal law In Allouche v France [2024] ECHR 305  Ms Allouche, who is Jewish, found herself in a disturbing relationship with one B, a bartender in a café near her workplace, which ended with him sending her antisemitic e-mail threats of violence, rape and death. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Jeffrey J. Spina-Jennings
As a reminder for those familiar, the acts that trigger an excise tax include: (i) taxes on the private foundation’s net investment income,[15] (ii) prohibitions on self-dealing transactions,[16] (iii) failure to make the required five percent (5%) qualifying distributions to charities,[17] (iv) prohibition on excess business holdings,[18] (v) prohibition on holding jeopardizing investments,[19] and (vi) taxable expenditures,[20] none of which apply to a 501(c)(4).[21] … [read post]