Search for: "ICON Health & Fitness, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2014, 3:14 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2014, 9:59 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., United States Supreme Court (4/29/14)PatentsThe Patent Act authorizes district courts to award attorney’s fees to prevailing parties in “exceptional cases,” 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:05 pm
Allcare Health Management System Inc. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:25 am
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., which makes it easier for a wrongfully accused defendant in a patent action to recover fees from a plaintiff, I am more interested in whether this same new decision will make it a little less likely that a wealthier company with a questionable patent will take to the courts to try to shut down a comparatively less wealthy competitor or, if not shut them down, to at least bog them down in litigation they cannot afford except by… [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:01 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (Apr. 29, 2014). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
Meanwhile, David Berry, writing for PatLit, discusses Octane Fitness LLC v ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
Icon Health and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
OCTANE FITNESS In the opinion delivered by Justice Sotomayor, the Court, in a 9-0 decision, construed the term “exceptional” in its plain and ordinary meaning and held that exceptional means “uncommon,” “rare,” and “not ordinary. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (April 29, 2014).IssueSection 285 of the Patent Act authorizes a district court to award attorney’s fees in patent litigation. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., rejects the Brooks Furniture framework as unduly rigid and inconsistent with the text of §285. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:46 am
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., the issue on appeal was what constitutes an “exceptional case,” which would allow a district court to award attorney fees to the prevailing party. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
Icon Health and Fitness and Highmark v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:59 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:45 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
Allcare Health Management System Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:39 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:32 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:11 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., concerning the proper standard of appellate review of a district court’s award of attorney’s fees in patent infringement cases. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:07 am
Icon Health (Supreme Court 2014) The Patent Act allows district courts to award attorney fees to the prevailing party in “exceptional cases. [read post]
