Search for: "IN RE: RULES FOR THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS"
Results 141 - 160
of 664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
Because the Judicial Conference is an instrument for the management of the lower federal courts, its committees have no mandate to prescribe rules or standards for any other body. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 9:05 pm
IN THE NEWS The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that Philadelphia’s protocol for letting election observers watch ballot counting followed state law. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Democratic National Committee (DNC)—may also reflect a general difference in judicial philosophy.Partisan politics are hardest to deny or downplay when the justices vote against type. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:57 pm
The way the framers recognized that by dividing the legislative, executive and judicial powers, each significant, but each limited, would minimize the risk of any form of tyranny. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
This itself involved a bit of hardball: the twelve Republicans on the committee broke (and acknowledged breaking) a committee rule that had held that two members of the minority party must be present to conduct business. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:02 am
F.E.C., which struck down long-established limits on aggregate campaign contributions by wealthy donors, Leahy and Senate Rules Committee Chair Chuck Schumer announced joint efforts to spotlight how “five justices once again have decided to rule on the side of moneyed interests,” beginning with former Justice John Paul Stevens’s high-profile testimony last week before the Senate Rules Committee. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
This immediate re-election prohibition was seen as a wall against would-be dictators. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
But the U.S. has a long history of pragmatic equivalence in the deployment of its prosecutorial and judicial apparatus. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
” But he noted future chief executives might face more constraints when Beijing loyalists packed the Election Committee. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
It has been established since Re Haughey[1971] I.R. 217, the classical statement of constitutional justice, that any public inquiry impugning a citizen’s right to a good name is amenable to judicial review, and therefore attracts the rule against bias as well as the audi alteram partem (‘fair hearing’) rule. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The way the Court answers that question could go a long way toward ending judicial elections in the states–a long-time goal of “reformers” who favor undemocratic selection committees dominated by ABA and trial-bar apparatchiks. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The way the Court answers that question could go a long way toward ending judicial elections in the states–a long-time goal of “reformers” who favor undemocratic selection committees dominated by ABA and trial-bar apparatchiks. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:32 pm
The Senate Judiciary Committee will be considering his nomination at a hearing next Wednesday, September 29. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm
We have consistently stated in this House that individual voters should be the ones determining the outcome of Ontario elections, not American-style political action committees or unaccountable pop-ups. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:37 am
European media could be subject to new rules that aim to protect journalism from state influence and snooping, according to a draft E.U. law. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm
The Court quietly ruled ruled on Abortion, Free Exercise, the Mueller Report, Voting Rights, and the Suspension Clause. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:29 am
Complete financial independence is not necessary for judicial independence. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 8:04 pm
Given the fact judicial retention elections are not exactly close calls, his bosses aren’t the voting public. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
In 1935, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote to the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee: “I hope your committee will not permit doubts as to constitutionality, however reasonable, to block the suggested legislation. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
Sharkey contended that incorporating the State Farm rule, which requires “reasoned decisionmaking” by the agency, into Chevron review would mitigate “judicial acquiescence to agencies’ legal statutory interpretations. [read post]
