Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO RULE 6-1(a) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS" Results 141 - 160 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
  On class actions, the Court found that the West Virginia Supreme Court (of Appeals) had done so. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
A New South Wales Supreme court judge ruled that Australian publishers are liable for defamatory comments on their Facebook sites. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,[1] recently argued in the Supreme Court, mainly concerns the limitations period for judicial review of agency decisions. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm by Bexis
  We pointed out these flaws in Hamilton here, and we’re pleased to note that, as of this writing, it appears likely that the Texas Supreme Court will hear a further appeal.5. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:16 am by Daniel Richardson
By David RangavizIn re K.F., 2013 VT 39Family law cases are almost invariably heartwrenching. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Both chose not to defend the constitutionality of the amendment, which had passed by a significant majority at the polls. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am by ASAD KHAN
In the case of Pereira, the Supreme Court considered the important issue of the correct approach to determining when it will be unreasonable to expect a non-British child who has been resident in the UK for seven or more years to leave the UK under para 276ADE(1)(iv) of the rules. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Baker, County Court Judge, dismissed the indictment with leave to re-present. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
In In re Mance, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that flat fees are not earned upon receipt. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
”[3]   Ultimately, the Colorado Supreme Court decided that “for purposes of deciding this case, we need not adopt a single, all-encompassing definition of the word ‘insurrection. [read post]