Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
Plaintiff claimed this violated California's Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumer Legal Remedies Act, as well as constituted fraudulent concealment and unjust enrichment. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
The post South Florida Breast Exams — Mammogram Quality in Question appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
The post South Florida Breast Exams — Mammogram Quality in Question appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
" -- resembles our answers to so many other questions posed at this blog: We don't have a clue.On to Question #2: If the drug industry's position prevails in Kent -- so federal law displaces certain state law provisions that expand plaintiffs' possible recoveries -- will drug companies move to, or reincorporate in, states that have favorable laws? [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office This case originated as a result of two European consortiums, the Swiss Interprofession du Gruyère and the French Syndicat Interprofessional du Gruyère (applicants), filing a certification mark for the term “gruyere” with the USPTO. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
But what about state adoption and birth certificate laws that still assume marriage is always between a man and a woman? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 2:37 am
In Comcast, the Supreme Court, re-stated–its now firmly entrenched view–that a plaintiff seeking class certification "’must affirmatively demonstrates his compliance’" with Rule 23(a) by showing that "’there are in fact sufficiently numerous parties, common questions of law or fact,’ typicality of claims or defenses, and adequacy of representation." [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:14 am
Typically, that argument is made in support of class certification. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
See In re Vioxx Prods. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:02 am
The first issue the court tackled, of course, is a biggie in class certification: choice of law. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:19 am
Because this is a common question, and because there are many misconceptions about common law marriage, I have decided to devote a post to this topic. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Law Lessons from IN RE INTEREST OF BPC; IN RE INTEREST OF BVC, App. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:22 am
Question 3: I am going to apply for a license (law, medical, nursing, real estate, etc.) and I had a criminal conviction in my past. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
MVP Law Group would like to thank everyone who contributed a question or comment. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:05 pm
I’d want to hear why not (it looks to me like a question about the limits upon interpretation imposed by state law, with no obvious federal law component). [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:44 am
’ questions, etc. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Pacific REGISTER HERE About the Program You’re invited to our highly anticipated webinar, where Seyfarth Shaw LLP’s leading attorneys in non-compete law will skillfully guide you through the intricacies of non-compete agreements in the United States, focusing on the latest updates in 2023. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:19 pm
Charles McCardle, an 8-page, 5-0 opinion in an appeal argued Nov. 1, 2007, Justice Rucker writes:The question raised in this opinion is whether a marriage solemnized in another state in violation of that state's law may be recognized as valid in this state if the marriage complies with this state's law. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
As already noted, the question on a motion to proceed as a collective action is whether the proposed plaintiffs are similarly situated “with respect to their allegations that the law has been violated. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
This tactic is more commonly used in states where class action law differs markedly from federal law, or where the judicial climate is considered much more friendly to plaintiffs in a state court.) [read post]
