Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC"
Results 141 - 160
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2010, 4:29 pm
Hoff Curtis 100 Main Street, PO Box 1124 Burlington, VT 05401 Office telephone: (802) 864-6400 Fax: 802-860-1565 email: rcassidy@hoffcurtis.com Blog: http://onlawyering.com/ www.hoffcurtis.com October 10, 2010 Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Board 2418 Airport Rd, Ste 2 Barre, VT 05641 Via email to: JUD-AttyLicensing@state.vt.us Re: Request for Comments on the Vermont Professionalism Rule Dear Judge Carroll and… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm
It's the fault of the Supreme Court for using this reasoning in Marsh v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:17 pm
The Supreme Court rejected certiorari. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:54 pm
” See Louisiana Supreme Court: Mandatory Continuing Legal Education. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
"Farewell, Stevens: the Supreme Court loses its cryptographer" http://j.mp/aOsGAU i guess this is a good move from techcrunch ... [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
I try to address briefly almost all of the significant areas of current controversy that continue to arise in the Court’s docket. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
We reverse the order granting a new trial and remand the matter back to the trial court to rule on the JNOV. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
It is a freedom which has been defended vigorously and repeatedly by the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:13 pm
Mandatory state bars are bureaucracies. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
Supreme Court upheld that state regulators have permitting authority over the disputed tracts. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Supreme Court upheld that state regulators have permitting authority over the disputed tracts. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
The Queen of England continues to be our official figure-head of state. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
[Plaintiff] can hardly avoid violating this Kafkaesque rule. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
What is also unique about the book is that at times it is written like a treatise and at other times it includes the full text of court decisions like a law school case book. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine ranges far beyond the opinion to explore the legal and business context in which then-Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Andrew G.T. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle:… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Supreme Court, April 16, 2008 Burgess v. [read post]
