Search for: "IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY"
Results 141 - 160
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
As for the future, the recent trend of legislating from the bench - cases such as KSR, eBay, In re Seagate etc. have drastically limited the value of this business model. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:11 am
Seagate to Pay up to $1.8M in Attorney Fees in False Advertising Suit
The Associated Press
Seagate Technology will pay up to $1.79 million in plaintiffs attorney fees and reimburse millions of customers to settle a lawsuit accusing the company of overstating the storage capacity of its hard drives. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 4:28 am
Of particular interest, the willfulness instruction, at page 35, is likely one of the first that used the new objective recklessness standard from In re Seagate. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
I recently moderated a roundtable discussion by three top patent lawyers to assess the significance and impact of the Aug. 20 en banc decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, In re Seagate Technology. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
In In re Seagate Technology, LLC (August 20, 2007), the court made it harder for a patent owner to prove willful infringement. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:02 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.In re Seagate Technology, LLC. (08/20/2007) (errata: LINK): please refer to Greg Duff's summary of this case, entitled "Federal Circuit Clarifies Willfulness Standard" available here: LINKOrmco Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:17 pm
” The White House also expressed its approval for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in In re Seagate Technology, which, in the administration’s words: “eliminated the ‘duty of care’ and held that enhanced damages are only appropriate where the infringer acts with reckless disregard of the patentee’s rights. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
" In re Seagate Technology, LLC, Civ. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 4:28 am
Last week the Federal Circuit’s opinion in In re Seagate Technology, LLC raised the bar for a finding of willful infringement in patent litigation. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:41 am
The Court also addressed the scope of a defendant's waiver of its attorney-client privilege and work product protection resulting from the defendant's assertion of the advice-of-counsel defense to a willful infringement claim.In In re Seagate Technology, LLC, the Court abolished the "affirmative duty of care" set forth in Underwater Devices Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:23 pm
The patent owner in In re Seagate Technology (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
The Federal Circuit took a swipe at patent law and changed one point of law and clarified another in the case of In Re Seagate Technology, LLC.Back in 1983 in another patent case, the Federal Circuit established a test for willfulness (a finding that can double damage awards) that to the court sitting now sounded "akin to negligence. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 11:24 pm
By Charles S. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
Case: In Re Seagate Technology, LLC, Civ. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:54 am
In Re Seagate Technology LLC (misc. docket no. 830), August 20, 2007 (link)Seagate was sued by Convolve in the SDNY for patent infringement. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:36 am
In In re Seagate Technology, LLC (August 20, 2007), en banc the Federal Circuit overruled Underwater Devices Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
(Or liable for attorney's fees in Hatch-Waxman litigation.)How do you know when you're in trouble? [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
In re Seagate Technology, LLC, Misc. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in In re Seagate Technology, LLC. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:32 pm
In a rare unanimous en banc opinion, the CAFC has overruled its prior precedent — holding that willful infringement enhanced damages now requires “at least a showing of objective recklessness. [read post]
