Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: J. F., A CHILD"
Results 141 - 160
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am
“Parenting time may be modified at any time, without a showing of serious endangerment, upon a showing of changed circumstances that necessitates modification to serve the best interests of the child. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Family Court Act section 1055 subdivision (j), opening paragraph was designated paragraph (i) and a new paragraph (ii) was added. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
Cameron and Judge Kristen F. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
Following a permanency hearing, Family Court granted petitioner’s request, finding that “[a] permanency plan of placement for adoption” was in the child’s best interests. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:14 am
” Chafin, 568 U.S. at 185 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
But, in case you are interested, I’ve included a copy of this list at the end of this post. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
But, in case you are interested, I’ve included a copy of this list at the end of this post. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am
Forty-one tax wage and salary income, while one state—New Hampshire—exclusively taxes dividend and interest income. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:16 am
Cynthia J. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
(Domestic Relations Law § 76–f [2][a]-[h] ). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
(Domestic Relations Law § 76–f [2][a]-[h] ). [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Herbert, 961 F. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
In addition to a “verified petition” showing “that the circumstances of the child or one or both parents or joint legal or physical custodians have materially and substantially changed since the entry of the order to be modified” and that the modification is in the child’s best interest, both parents must also have complied in good faith with an applicable dispute resolution procedure. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
Kaye, Melanie J. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am
Stevens, 533 F.3d 218, 232–35 (3d Cir. 2008) (deciding the constitutionality of a dog-fighting statute on strict scrutiny grounds alone). [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:14 am
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè; A-tún-orí-tí-kò sunwòn… [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
Whoa, what the f*&% just happened? [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
