Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. W., A CHILD" Results 141 - 160 of 647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2020, 9:58 am by Masha Simonova, Nathaniel Sobel
Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, a division of HHS, “to such extent and in such manner as shall in his judgment promote the public interest. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest          An article by Joel R. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am by Jonathan Holbrook
. __ (March 17, 2020) The defendant was indicted for taking indecent liberties with a child and went to trial. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Seen this before w/Hatch-Waxman w/communications about generics suggesting they were outdated or less effective. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:33 am by Christopher Tyner
Judge Berger concurred in result only, stating that “anyone interested in efficiencies and saving taxpayer dollars should hope the Supreme Court of North Carolina takes advantage of this opportunity to return us to the plain language of [G.S.] 15A-1444(a2). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Judgment in hand=much smaller set w/its own problems; w/ notice regime, there will be default takedowns. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Immense disruption in market for child sex trafficking, which continues. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Participation in group for people parenting a child with clubfoot: b/c FB didn’t have to vet any post, that group exists and is greatly beneficial to participants. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(c)(2) isn’t actually bothering most people [just you wait]; (c)(1) does. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:37 pm by Maria Hook
This note may serve as a careful first step – I would be interested to hear other views. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:29 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals decided yesterday, Jan. 7, 2020. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
The IRS sends letters – known as “Letter 226-J” – informing employers that they owe a penalty based on information the employer provided on Forms 1094 and 1095-C, information employees provided on individual income tax returns, and information the insurance exchanges provide regarding eligibility for subsidies. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Reactive to lobbying pressure from manufacturing interests. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division observed that >[w]illful interference with a noncustodial parent=s right to [parental access] is so inconsistent with the best interests of the child[ ] as to, per se, raise a strong probability that the offending party is unfit to act as a custodial parent=. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
Equally interesting, the same was true during my Clinton Board, when we used the most effective enforcement tool in the Act, Section 10(j), at historically unprecedented frequency. [read post]