Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF J. B., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 141 - 160
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
One of the most interesting aspects of the discussion of the history of codification of U.S. law, and its failure, is the connection between the urge to codify and the underlying rationale of the Institutes and the codified law it sought to explain. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Susan’s parentage petition was premised on a New Hampshire statute, RSA § 168-B:3, which presumes a man to be a father if he is married or has attempted to marry the child’s mother or if he “receives the child into his home and openly holds out the child as his child. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am
KAREN B. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
Additionally, the mother was responsible for paying a significant portion of the children's uninsured health-related and child-care expenses, as well as other costs associated with her extended and substantial parenting time, all of which impacted the mother's financial resources (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1-b][f][1] ). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
CAYEA and LORI J. [read post]
26 May 2014, 3:16 pm
The Court of Appeals has recognized that when a child's best interests are endangered, such objectives must yield to the State's paramount concern for the health and safety of the child. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
Code §§ 2252(a). . . and (b)”, Aron Lichtenberger moved to suppress evidence of child pornography [found] on his laptop. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
(J) (A), (B), (C) or (D), at Father's option. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Michael B. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said that, on May 30, 2006, the Administration for Children's Services (ACS) filed a motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 1039-b for entry of an order that finds that reasonable efforts to return the subject child to respondent mother are not required, because the court had entered a finding of severe abuse and aggravated circumstances as defined in Family Court Act § 1012 (j). [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 11:41 am
Interesting result, right? [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
In Kerr and Baranow, Cromwell J. succinctly said the following about the rights of common law couples to claim an interest in property "cohabitation does not, in itself under the common law of unjust enrichment, entitle one party to a share of the other's property or any other relief. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:52 pm
If that were the case the many inaccurate articles published before the publication of Mostyn J’s Court of Protection case would by now have been corrected. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
G-J. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Murray revealed that Joey was never lost in Central Park, but instead was living with her mother in Freeport, Maine. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
Subsequently, this afternoon Mostyn J’s decision authorising the delivery of the child by means of c-section was published. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Nassau Co. 2005 [Falanga, J.]) [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 11:44 am
(Termination of parental rights; child neglect; "On appeal, the mother claims that, with respect to Etta, the court made clearly erroneous factual findings that: (1) the Department of Children and Families (department) made reasonable efforts to reunify the mother and Etta; (2) the mother is unable or unwilling to benefit from reunification efforts; (3) the mother failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation under General Statutes § 17a-112… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
”), medical doctors are most interested in the effective treatment of their patients, and thus typically tell it like it is. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 7:01 am
(j) The demonstrated knowledge, capacity, and disposition of each parent to be informed of the circumstances of the minor child, including, but not limited to, the child’s friends, teachers, medical care providers, daily activities, and favorite things. [read post]
