Search for: "INTELLIGENT INVESTMENTS, INC. v. US " Results 141 - 160 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette had a piece “Evening Standard and independent owner applies for judicial review against Saudi investments probe”. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:27 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Sunday, March 17, 2019 Tags: Accountable Capitalism Act, Citizens United v. [read post]
In light of the DOJ’s promise to use the FCA to improve cybersecurity, federal contractors should refamiliarize themselves with the Supreme Court’s 2016 holding in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
In light of the DOJ’s promise to use the FCA to improve cybersecurity, federal contractors should refamiliarize themselves with the Supreme Court’s 2016 holding in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am by Eric Goldman
It’s essentially impossible to comment intelligently on Trump’s lies/grievances in the complaints, and pointless too. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
First, the Commission rejects financial materiality as the touchstone for its disclosures,[4] and fails to offer in its place a meaningful intelligible limit to its disclosure authority.[5] The release explains that Congress gave “the Commission, which regulates dynamic aspects of a market economy,” “intentionally broad” authority to require disclosures on a wide range of matters, even ones that do “not directly relate to a company’s value and financial… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
 Mandelman Inc. was a corporation I used to do some publishing and consulting under, although I haven’t done such work in quite some time… maybe 8-10 years. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by William McGrath
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am by Rick Hills
Should the NY Court of Appeals use this argument for mayoral power to uphold the HAIL Act under Adler v. [read post]