Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
If the United States, for example, mandated back doors and golden keys for law enforcement, it would harm the ability of American technology companies and telecommunications providers to compete globally and it could stifle innovation at home. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:24 pm
Hillman is the senior fellow for trade and international political economy at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), specializing in U.S. trade policy, the law and politics of the World Trade Organization (WTO), international organizations, and Brexit. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm
Prior to the licensing of paralegals in Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the issue of agents in R. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am
Bush used IEEPA to cut off al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups from the international financial system. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
Alibaba subsidiary Pingtouge has released the XuanTie 910, a chip processor with possible applications ranging from autonomous driving to 5G telecommunications. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
In Katz v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:36 am
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Use of a mark in a company name results in a finding of “instrument of fraud”, just like for domain namesBayerische Motoren Werke v BMW Telecommunications Limited, Benjamin Michael Whitehouse [2019] EWHC 411 (IPEC) (February 2019)Benjamin Michael Whitehouse has the initials BMW. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Section 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), passed by Congress and signed by President Trump, mandates: (a) The head of an executive agency may not— (A) procure or obtain or extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system; or (B) enter into a… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:14 am
March 31, 2019: International Traffic and Revenue Reports – ELIMINATED International 214 licensees and interconnected VoIP providers offering services between the U.S. and international points were required to report certain information about their international traffic and revenue to the FCC twice a year. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
It seems arguable that the SEP owner has not complied with its obligation to grant licences on FRAND terms if an implementor offers a FRAND licence which is refused.The Court of Appeal remarks on the concern raised by Birss J about the potential imbalance and international coercion, stating “the term coercion is used in this context to imply improper duress or compulsion. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
We will see where that takes the people, the state, and the revolution. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
Habibullah, American International University, Bangladesh Your Spying Smart Phone: Individual Privacy Is Narrowly Strengthened in Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
I am of course referring to United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Cartier: Supreme Court shifts the costs burden towards rights holders and away from ISPsCartier v British Telecommunications Plc [2018] UKSC 28, UK Supreme Court (June 2018)First looked at back in Volume I, at the Court of Appeal level, this case confirmed that blocking injunctions were available against internet service providers against websites which infringe trade marks. [read post]
