Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
The New York Times reports that passengers on foreign airlines to the United States from ten airports in eight Muslim-majority countries have been barred from carrying electronic devices larger than a cell phone under new flight restrictions. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:24 pm
The government cites United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
X of the State Constituti [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
X of the State Constitution but also 147 includes eligible patients, as that term is defined in s [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:57 am
State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
No. 47–1 ¶ 12.)In December 2014, a foreign law enforcement agency informed the FBI it suspected a United States-based IP address was associated with Playpen. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:30 am
He assured them that the material was going to an overseas market where no one from the United States would view it. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 3:36 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005); United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Inherent in this process is recognition that a lexical unit is functioning as a referent and not as a description. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
” desan@law.harvard.eduChris gave us a deeply theorized account of the rise of currency that began with the identification of a binary that separates the Market (marked by transactions, money, profit) from the State (politics, law, and judgment). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
Case 2: InCom Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 2:58 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
