Search for: "In Interest of SJC" Results 141 - 160 of 421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 12:56 am by William D. Kickham, Esq.
The SJC made it very clear: The Massachusetts public records statute does not apply to campus police records at private schools. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 3:28 am by William D. Kickham, Esq.
The SJC made it very clear: The Massachusetts public records statute does not apply to campus police records at private schools. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:07 am by Michael DelSignore
PBS.org has an interesting article about DNA testing used in court, which sheds some more light on issues like this. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm by Samuel Goldberg
” That your perspective and interests are automatically going to be valued very much by the system. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Keith L. Miller
Cain, an attorney was found to have fabricated documents, lied to his clients, and failed to diligently pursue his client’s claims and interests. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:47 am by David Duncan
  This firm signed an amicus brief submitted by the Cato Institute, urging the SJC to do so. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:38 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Same-sex marriage has been recognized in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts since 2004, when the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its opinion on the landmark case of Goodridge v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court certified to the SJC the questions of whether there was a countervailing State interest, and if so, whether the ban was adequately tailored. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:37 am by Daniel Cappetta
Therefore, there is a significant liberty interest at stake for any individual facing such a petition and mounting a strong defense is crucial. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:27 am by Naomi Shatz
” In coming to this decision the Court went through an interesting exploration of how to determine race, and what racial factors are relevant to eyewitness identifications. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:13 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The plaintiff has also filed claims for pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, attorney’s fees and court costs. [read post]
Under such circumstances, common sense judicial rulings allowing the injured to hold careless property owners accountable so they can’t shift their, or their insurers, responsibility for harm they caused to the injured person’s medical insurer, which often is Medicare or Medicaid, are warranted and in the public interest. [read post]
Under such circumstances, common sense judicial rulings allowing the injured to hold careless property owners accountable so they can’t shift their, or their insurers, responsibility for harm they caused to the injured person’s medical insurer, which often is Medicare or Medicaid, are warranted and in the public interest. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:36 pm by Samuel Goldberg
For example, the SJC has permitted such checkpoints as an exception to the individual suspicion requirement “‘on the grounds that a “reasonable” roadblock involves a “minimal” state intrusion upon the reduced privacy of drivers, one that is outweighed by the strong public interest in reducing the carnage caused by drunk drivers,’” as Judge Hely said, quoting the SJC’s 1989 Commonwealth v. [read post]