Search for: "In Matter of David J. Felt*" Results 141 - 160 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2012, 6:48 pm by Larry Catá Backer
, Booth, David; Cammack, Diana; Harrigan, Jane; Kanyongolo, Edge; Mataure, Mike and Ngwira, Naomi, Drivers of Change and Development in Malawi. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 10:33 am by Lindsay Griffiths
On this panel, we had David Booker, the Director and Senior Counsel of the Legal Department at Credit Agricole, Stacey Blaustein, an Attorney in Corporate Litigation for IBM Corporation, and the Honorable Ronald J. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:01 am by admin
“If you don’t take the pittance they offer, they’re going to put on the boxing gloves and they’re going to batter injured victims,” plaintiffs attorney J. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:15 am by Dennis Crouch
"  July 4 – A two-part session on (1) the new administrative structure for challenging US patents and the new scope of patentable subject matter. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the order of Tugendhat J ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) in JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Gillespie, David Rosenfeld and Julia Croome, for the plaintiff (respondent) Heard:  May 9-12, 2011 On appeal from the judgment of Justice J.R. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
The modern doctrine of forum non conveniens Forum non conveniens, literally “the forum not coming together,” is a common law doctrine by which a suit must be dismissed if the choice of forum, because of its geographical location, presents an undue burden on one or more of the parties. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
The modern doctrine of forum non conveniens Forum non conveniens, literally “the forum not coming together,” is a common law doctrine by which a suit must be dismissed if the choice of forum, because of its geographical location, presents an undue burden on one or more of the parties. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:02 am by war
Wilcox J was not prepared to order damages at a reasonable royalty level because, as is typically the case, there was no way Autodesk would have licensed Cheung or, for that matter, that Cheung would have paid for a licence from Autodesk. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am by Mandelman
Arm Yourself With the Weapons You Need In the Foreclosure Battle Learn how to: Identify false documents; Deconstruct an MSP life of loan transactional history and create a comprehensible worksheet that any Judge can understand; Learn how to prove servicers wrong when they’re “sticking to their story;” All you ever wanted to know about MERS (and how it helps you); Who owns the mortgage and foreclosure law firms and their structure and organization; What you need to know about… [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:40 am by Sheila Blackford
“If you build time into your day to, say, run at noon, then you have an automatic stress break,” says Thoughtful Law blogger David J. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by FDABlog HPM
Karst –       An April 21st letter penned by David Balto, a Senior Fellow at American Progress who focuses on competition policy, intellectual property law and health care, and Michael Carrier, a professor at the Rutgers University School of Law-Camden, and sent to five U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
The matter had been reported on BBC national radio and local television news and had featured in Private Eye on several occasions during 2010. [read post]