Search for: "In Matter of Stewart"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 1:02 pm
It's a very serious matter because this is evidence of wrongdoing. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am
Deputy SGs Malcolm Stewart and Eric Feigin lead the contingent of several of their colleagues. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
US Supreme Court official portrait of Potter Stewart, 1976 Oyez reports that Justice Stewart believed in judicial restraint, seeing the proper function of a judge as interpreting the law as it applied to a particular case, rather than attempting to assert judicial influence over matters he saw best left to the legislature. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
As the oral argument unfolded at the Supreme Court, it became apparent that the case might well be remanded for further proceedings, as David Stewart has recommended. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 3:48 am
He wasn’t a bad judge or person, but simply not sufficiently dedicated to producing the correct progressive outcome no matter what, which is what one might well argue is what is expected of a good judge. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:10 am
Along with these rapidly evolving events, what should have been a one-day, Washington-centric story soon became fodder for late night comedy shows such as those of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, primarily because of the White House’s shifting rationale for the Vice President’s position. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Stewart Baker sat down with Dmitri Alperovitch, Rosenzweig, and Jim Dempsey to catch up on a month of cyberlaw news, including U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:48 am
In any child custody lawsuit in Ohio, there are two major matters that underpin each and every child custody order. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
According to two people familiar with the matter, the aim of the inquiry is to help Attorney General Merrick B. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
As an initial matter, it purports to allow ATF—rather than Congress—to set forth the scope of criminal prohibitions. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
As an initial matter, it purports to allow ATF—rather than Congress—to set forth the scope of criminal prohibitions. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
” For example, as explained in Chapter 6, the Committee obtained texts between the anti-government Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and Robert Weaver, a failed Trump political appointee who co-led the Christian Nationalist “Jericho March,” on Dec. 12, 2020, in Washington, D.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
If you need guidance on divorce, dissolution, or other domestic relations matters, please contact Janet Stewart Scalley at (JS@kjk.com; 216.736.7261). [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:12 pm
Try quoting this Manual, or the text from the Stewart case, in an attempt to calmly educate counsel regarding improper objections. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
On Jan. 8, a grand jury charged eleven members of the Oath Keepers paramilitary group, including its founder, Elmer Stewart Rhodes, III, with seditious conspiracy—the first use of that charge in more than a decade. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
As a matter of goals, the economic and social agendas of the Party have become efforts to take things away from "undeserving" others. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:34 am
Chief Justice O'Connor and Justices Brunner and Stewart concurred in the judgement only, but none wrote separately to defend deference to agency interpretations. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:30 am
If reauthorization depends on Republican votes and a Republican speaker’s engagement, Republican concerns matter. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:41 pm
Later, a federal judge reviewing the document and emails discussing the matter between Trump and his staff concluded that “The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public” and found that the emails were “sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
Baroness Hoey subsequently raised the matter in the House of Lords, and the Advocate General for Scotland, Lord Stewart of Dirleton, replied as follows: “The Wessex Area of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has undertaken a post-case review and acknowledges that the statement was inappropriate. [read post]
