Search for: "In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 141 - 160
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Rule 3 of the Washington Rules of Civil Procedure, which you can find here, states that someone initiates a civil suit by filing a Complaint with the Court. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
In the 1990 amendment to the CAA, the agency was directed by Congress to develop National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, but it also established a “unique procedure” to determine the applicability of the HAP program to fossil-fueled power plants. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 a few weeks ago, in Walker v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
§ 2284 is insubstantial, and that three judges therefore are not required, not because it concludes that the complaint is wholly frivolous, but because it concludes that the complaint fails to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
And when he did, he tried to amend the petition in the closed case rather than initiating a new civil case. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
District Court, which means that the litigation process was governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:26 am
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)(B) provides, “[d]iscovery of facts known and opinions held by experts, otherwise discoverable under the provisions […] of this rule and acquired or developed in anticipation of litigation or for trial, may be obtained only as follows […] A party may discover facts known or opinions held by an expert who has been retained […] by another party in anticipation of litigation or preparation… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
If you’re wondering how those cases are racking up their second relist when you’ve never heard of them before, that’s because on February 9, the Court took each of them out of stasis they’ve been lingering in since their original Conferences and relisted them for the February 20 Conference. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Denturist Association of Canada, 2014 FC 989, the Federal Court ruled that copyright does not subsist in the five-digit numerical codes and corresponding description of denturist services contained within the DAC Procedures Codes and DAC Fee Guides. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
Labor relations -- Fair Labor Standards Act -- Overtime -- Former employees of Florida construction contractor brought suit claiming contractor failed to pay wages, including overtime, that they were entitled to receive under FLSA -- Jurisdiction -- District court had subject matter jurisdiction where face of complaint alleged federal claim for unpaid, overtime hours -- Statement of claim that plaintiffs filed under the local practices did not amend that jurisdictional basis out of… [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Alabama, holding that life without parole for minors violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 13-10400, is the high-profile one, asking whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) gives a district court the discretion to extend the time for service of process absent a showing of good cause. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in In re Engle Cases, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 4435893 (11th Cir. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
See Caplan, Free Speech and Civil Harassment Orders, 64 Hastings L.J. at 823-24 (discussing the relevance of Snyder to civil harassment cases). [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:33 pm
Procedural HistoryKrauser sued [BioHorizons] in Florida state court, seeking a declaration that [...] [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:10 am
The rule is procedural, not jurisdictional. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
However, the problem with the opt out procedure under the OVDP rules insofar as reducing the FBAR penalty is that the IRS intended the opt-out procedure to apply only to “a discrete minority” of cases. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
In re Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules, 95 So.3d 114, 115 (Fla.2012). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
THERESE UJOWUNDU, et al., Appellees. 3rd District.Jurisdiction -- Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Evidentiary hearing -- Although summons was regular on its face in contradiction of defendant's allegation, trial court erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing after defendant submitted affidavit of non-service alleging summons was improperly left on her apartment doorstepTIARA DAVIS, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Powell rule that Fourth Amendment claims aren’t cognizable on habeas). [read post]
