Search for: "In Re: Amendments to the Supreme Court Rules Relating to Admissions to the Bar"
Results 141 - 160
of 244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of California, January 21, 2010 In re Freeman, No. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Whether the results derived from the impugned techniques amount to `testimonial compulsion' thereby attracting the bar of Article 20(3)? [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth… [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
Baez also contended that the trial court should have allowed him to represent himself, but the supreme court rejected this claim also, ruling that defendant did, eventually, accept the representation of appointed counsel. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Brown’s execution was in violation of the Eighth Amendment bar on cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:51 pm
We see no indication that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted the libel-proof plaintiff doctrine as a bar to liability, at the pleading stage or otherwise. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Koninklijke Philips Electronics Docket: 09-389 Issue: Whether a party contesting the jurisdiction of the district court must first move to vacate or set aside a default judgment pursuant to either Rule 55(c) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the District Court as a prerequisite to appealing the default judgment. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Supreme Court, May 19, 2008 US v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
We’re accepting wagers on what the Court will do with these two rehearing petitions at the fast-approaching end of the Term. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
Maryland holding that the Eighth Amendment erects a per se bar against a victim's family members' characterizations and opinions about the crime, defendant, and appropriate sentence; and (2) to the extent that any part of Booth survives, whether it applies to a sentencing proceeding in which death is not option.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Utah)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the National Crime… [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Many criminal convictions are bars to admission for non U.S. citizens. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
As a result, courts are being called upon to apply the church autonomy doctrine – which bars courts from reviewing matters of faith, doctrine, and church governance – where commercial conduct is religiously motivated. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
at 821-22, 827.A no-evidence point will be sustained when (1) there is a complete absence of evidence of a vital fact, (2) the court is barred by rules of law or evidence from giving weight to the only evidence offered to prove a vital fact, (3) the evidence offered to prove a vital fact is no more than a mere scintilla, or (4) the evidence conclusively establishes the opposite of a vital fact. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
New York State courts had already ruled and a foreclosure judgment was issued, so now U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mastromatteo, No. 06-2349 Denial of defendant's motion for a Franks hearing and his sentence for drug-related offenses are affirmed where: 1) defendant's failure to obtain a written conditional plea was not a jurisdictional bar to the circuit court's hearing the appeal; 2) the district court did not err in holding that defendant lacked standing to contest a search of [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Petitioners ask whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Wecht, No. 07-4767 In a trial accusing a public official of misusing his office for private financial gain, an order to withhold from the public the names and addresses of prospective and trial jurors is vacated where: 1) the collateral order doctrine granted jurisdiction to hear the appeal; 2) intervenors-media companies had standing to challenge the order; 3) there is a presumptive First Amendment right to obtain the names of jurors prior to empanelment, which was not overcome here; but… [read post]
