Search for: "In Re: FDIC"
Results 141 - 160
of 704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 7:21 pm
Also, they raised $875 million of new capital to dump into the banking system (and they're raising another $500 million in the IPO). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:06 pm
So successful, in fact, that the FDIC and California bank regulators became alarmed at the rapid growth of the branch and the fact that so much of the business involved large cash deposits and transactions. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:02 pm
But since we're in the world of politics, it's worth noting that FDIC head Sheila Bair is doing very well out of this crisis; better, I would warrant, than Christopher Cox, in that it looks like she's actually participating in shaping the government response. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am
Upcoming Posts In the next bank insolvency post, we're going to talk about the FDIC's 1997 policy for use of the D'Oench, Duhme doctrine and Section 13(e) of the FDI Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 6:49 pm
" If you're not a member of TheCorporateCounsel.net, try a '09 no-risk trial to access this webcast for free. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm
Whether or not Killinger et al. will ultimately prevail or will ultimately decide to settle, it seems they've reached the point where they're telling the FDIC that if its thinks it can prove a breach of duty of due care notwithstanding the prudent business judgment rule, then have at it, because the defendants aren't buying what the FDIC is selling in the way of a settlement offer. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 8:19 am
FDIC (2000), where the court held that ALJs of the FDIC are not inferior officers. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:15 am
DOVERUnpublishedhttp://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0138n-06.pdfThe Court denied the Defendant’s appeal of summary judgment granted in favor of the USA and FDIC on an issue of res judicata. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
In September, the FDIC seized Corus Bank of Chicago. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:30 am
Now they're suffering the agony of defeat. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 4:46 pm
In fact they’re virtually guaranteeing themselves a profit. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
The same goes for the FDIC after they're appointed as receiver on the Appointment Date. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
The same goes for the FDIC after they're appointed as receiver on the Appointment Date. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:38 pm
Therefore, shouldn't consumer advocates, including the "We're Just Here To Help You" crowd from the KGB CFPB, think that banks entering this business is a potentially good thing for consumers? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:52 pm
One strike and you're out. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
It certainly rings true to those of us who've been through the massive loan participation workout wars of the 1980s, but we're smart enough to know that when the FDIC puts whatever assumptions it wants to put into "its little black box" that spits out cost calculations (as I once heard a former Federal Home Loan Bank Board general counsel describe it), the "costs" of any course of action the FDIC decides to take will turn out to be--Voila! [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 10:16 pm
On the other hand, when you're the FDIC official who has to make the decision to shut down a bank, the decision becomes a bit tougher to make, and I'm personally relieved to see some restraint by the FDIC. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
The same goes for the FDIC after they're appointed as receiver on the Appointment Date. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 pm
"It's hard to get around the fact we're in an unprecedented economic downturn," he said. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:42 pm
That's what you're dealing with, state bankers and state bank regulators. [read post]
