Search for: "In Re Adoption of Rule"
Results 141 - 160
of 13,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
On April 23, 2024, the FTC voted 3-2 to adopt a final rule prohibiting non-compete agreements in employment contracts. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm
The rules we adopt today apply only to offerings of mass-market broadband service providing indiscriminate access to all or substantially all Internet endpoints, which consumers understand to transparently transmit information to and from the Internet applications and services of their choosing without being curated or edited by their BIAS provider. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:47 am
That’s why we’re suing to find out what the NSA is hiding. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Curiously, the NPRM stipulated a 25% share restriction that neither California nor any other state has adopted. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:09 am
The final text of the EHDS was adopted by the European Parliament on 24 April 2024 and is expected to be formally adopted by the European Council in the coming months. 1: Wellness Applications and Medical Devices in Relation to Electronic Health Records a) Wellness applications The EHDS contains specific provisions on “wellness applications” that claim interoperability with electronic health records (“EHRs”). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:43 am
The U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to employers in Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah) recently warned that the training required by a Colorado state agency included some content that could constitute unwelcome race-based harassment. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
Stafford, 226 F.3d 275 (3d Cir. 2000); In re NVIDIA Sec. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
The gag order closely tracks the one adopted by the DC Circuit in the federal election interference case against Trump, here with the additional protection for jurors. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
Case Commented On: KMN v SZM, 2024 BCCA 70 (CanLII), overturning 2023 BCSC 940 (CanLII) We have both written previously on myths and stereotypes about intimate partner violence (IPV), one of the most common of which is that women make false or exaggerated claims of violence to gain an advantage in family law disputes (see here and here). [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
I wanted to go back and re-listen to Harriet Harman’s response to my query – but in fact that has gone too. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
SEC Adopts Market Participant Dealer Rule. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But irrespective of the context, if you’re speaking on AI, you too must ensure that you do so in a manner that is not materially false or misleading. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
The case has a custody aspect as well since Kemble sought to be re-united with her teenage daughters who were then the “property” of their father. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
” The provision was adopted to prevent former Confederates from returning to power after the Civil War. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
” (Cites to In re Facebook, Barrett v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:07 am
Arguments on Appeal: On appeal, Dawgs argues that the district court overextended Dastar and its progeny by adopting a per se rule that terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” can never be actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But most all rules I have ever seen—especially in public address settings—do not go that far; they simply prevent “disruption” the way Stanford’s (and seemingly Maryland’s) own rules apparently do.So what can/ought we do with people who engage in shouting down? [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:22 pm
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) directed the FCC to adopt rules to prevent “digital discrimination of access” based on income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin. [read post]
