Search for: "In Re Application for Water Rights"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2009, 11:43 pm
See, e.g., In re Hudson News Co., 39 USPQ2d at 1923. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
” Despite the decision, the ACOE decided to re-issue the JD as final still concluding that the wetlands were federally protected. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
Dude, you’re so close. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:28 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Application of)In re Andrew S. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:30 pm
You're totally right in this one. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
” Additionally, while the case has since been overruled, in In re Mar [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:09 pm
Hudson (Indian Civil Rights Act; Jurisdiction) In re K.H. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
Editorial director of From Chains to Bonds, (UNESCO, 1998), he wrote the preface to Tradition orale et archives de la traite négrière (UNESCO, 2001), as well as the editorial of Newsletter No. 2 of ‘The Slave Route’ (UNESCO, 2001). [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 2:15 am
You’re probably thinking that there’s nothing particularly newsworthy about that, right? [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
Supreme Court to re-examine the landmark Sullivan ruling. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
In separate orders (142568, 142566 & (67)), the Court granted leave to appeal in In re Mays, Minors. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
An attorney who has experience can help you see what you need to do and provide you with the right way to fill out the application. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:03 pm
If you think you’re got problems, try being a farmer. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
Accordingly, attorneys for these legacy case plaintiffs claimed their clients were not obligated to re-submit administrative claims and were therefore eligible to file a lawsuit right away in court. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
Accordingly, attorneys for these legacy case plaintiffs claimed their clients were not obligated to re-submit administrative claims and were therefore eligible to file a lawsuit right away in court. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
Accordingly, attorneys for these legacy case plaintiffs claimed their clients were not obligated to re-submit administrative claims and were therefore eligible to file a lawsuit right away in court. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
In re Loew's Theatres, Inc., supra at 868. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
App. 2009) ("[A]t the time Act 73 was enacted, it was Hawai‘i common law that shoreline property from the sea to the high-water mark was owned by the State, and any oceanfront accretions above the high-water mark belonged to the adjoining property owner...Act 73 clearly changed the common law by declaring that all accreted lands...was now state or public property. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
Sure, feds listen to your cell phone calls – but only when you’re making a call, and not after you’ve hung up – right? [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:32 pm
It is operated subject to a set of policies and operating rules issued by the parent company in the US and applicable throughout the operating ecology of the US parent (including codes of ethics, compliance, respect for human rights and environment, and the like). [read post]
