Search for: "In Re Application to Change Name"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 3:35 am
In considering the motion, the Board looks to the following requirements:(1) the proposed amendment must serve to limit the broader identification of goods;(2) applicant must consent to the entry of judgment on the grounds for opposition with respect to the broader identification of goods; and(3) if the applicant wishes to avoid the possibility of a res judicata effect by the entry of judgment on the original identification, the applicant must make a prima facie… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 2:26 pm
Father has not disputed the issue of paternity, and during the custody litigation he made a motion to change their son’s name to reflect his. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 2:35 am
In re SF Investments, Inc., Serial No. 86793304 (January 30, 2010) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:42 am
The court may grant a petition for modification that seeks to apply the changes made to Section 504 by these amendments to an order entered before the effective date of these amendments only upon a finding of a substantial change in circumstances that warrants application of the changes. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:04 am
GWGrefers to the group that reviews applications. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm
This is a very significant change. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 pm
A particularly deadly time bomb is....wait for it...., the "applicant party name. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 6:29 am
The change will make it easier for unions to retain bargaining units when work is re-tendered and a new provider chosen. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 6:29 am
The change will make it easier for unions to retain bargaining units when work is re-tendered and a new provider chosen. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:32 pm
” She submits that only Guidance or a change in legislation will meet the requirements of Article 10. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
VA wants to assess a penalty period if you or your spouse transfer any assets out of your names (e.g., into a protective trust) within 36 months prior to the date of application for benefits. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm
The question is whether Palomar-Santiago can defend against the re-entry prosecution based on the invalidity of the original removal order, or whether his defense must fail because he cannot meet additional requirements set forth by statute — namely, that he “exhausted” his options for pursuing an administrative appeal of the removal order, and that the original proceedings deprived him of judicial review. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:03 pm
Getting this stuff right is important, and it’s always best to handle these things as you’re starting up, so you don’t wind up having to backtrack, or unwind transactions later on when your structure changes. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:03 pm
Getting this stuff right is important, and it’s always best to handle these things as you’re starting up, so you don’t wind up having to backtrack, or unwind transactions later on when your structure changes. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:03 pm
Getting this stuff right is important, and it’s always best to handle these things as you’re starting up, so you don’t wind up having to backtrack, or unwind transactions later on when your structure changes. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In Re: W (A child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140 the Court of Appeal considered a case in which a Family Court judgment was severely critical of two witnesses and the applicant local authority. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 3:24 am
Thomson's claims in re-examination, make it hard to give credence to Dr. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 3:32 am
In re P.T. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 12:34 pm
What has certainly changed is Man's interpretation and application of Scripture.Was the Bible "less right" or "less true" in St.Paul's day than in our own? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
Now, unless you’re a refugee or an applicant for citizenship under a particular section, you’re just SOL. [read post]
