Search for: "In Re Barnett" Results 141 - 160 of 859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2019, 5:15 pm by Ronald Mann
… [Y]ou’re suggesting that we should look at this case as though the original claim never occurred and we should pretend that the claim started with the original defendant. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The intention of the Board is not to re-regulate the rail industry with burdensome new rules. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Also, no, you’re not going to make it through the final days of 2018 without yet another reference to Hamilton the musical.Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
The Republican party quickly coalesced around the legal arguments advanced by Randy Barnett and other members of this blog. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 12:00 pm by Anushka Limaye
Barnett explored how Canary Mission ultimately undermines the Israeli cause. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:48 am by Stefanie K. Vaudreuil
Although the plaintiff had previously worked as a lifeguard, it was seasonal employment that required him to re-apply each summer. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
Congress, where by one vote, that of Vice-president John Adams breaking a tie in the Senate, the President (in this case George Washington, of course) was given the unilateral power to say “you’re fired. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by ernst
 Sessions of the Law and Public Affairs Seminar at Princeton University are by invitation only, but this one is so interesting we’re posting news of it here anyway. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by ernst
  And we're not just saying that because works by two of the three LHB Bloggers appear on it! [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 5:58 am by Terry Hart
They’re phishing, they’re spamming, they’re hacking, they’re password-cracking, and basically doing anything to find personal credentials to get into academic institutions. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:37 am by Randy Barnett
On your other point on technology and the phone that you held up, I do think the Supreme Court case law in the Riley case written by Chief Justice Roberts, and the Carpenter case, both majority opinions, both show his and the Court's recognition of the issue that you're describing, in that technology—it's made things different. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:17 am by Randy Barnett
The point is, when the rules are set ahead of time by the precedent or by the law, then you're not making up the rules as you go along in the heat of the moment, which will seem unfair, which will seem like you're a partisan, because you're going to seem like you're favoring one side or the other because of allegiance or favoritism to that team rather than applying the rules ahead of time, which is why, in sports, there are a lot of detailed… [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm by Randy Barnett
I mean, just because you're on the majority doesn't mean you're right, correct? [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:00 pm by Randy Barnett
So, Justice Kagan, at her confirmation hearing, said we're all originalists now, which was her comment. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:37 am by Randy Barnett
I mean, just because you're on the majority doesn't mean you're right, correct? [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Randy Barnett
So, Justice Kagan, at her confirmation hearing, said we're all originalists now, which was her comment. [read post]