Search for: "In Re CDA"
Results 141 - 160
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2010, 5:05 am
If you’re limiting the claim, it should be integrated with the claim itself: no separate disclosure required. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
Much like the gun-sale groups, they scatter and then re-form within a short period of time. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
That’s the version of the statute we’re dealing with. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
It was a day that saw inboxes across the globe flooded with updated privacy policies and newsletter re-confirmations. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
What the court is really saying is that Amazon has to police the vendors…and we’re back to the “monitoring” obligation the court says Amazon doesn’t have. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
On the point of Search Engine Land authors making adequate disclosures, Danny responded: Going forward, we're drafting up a disclosure statement that will be added to our contributor guidelines, and our contributors will get a reminder of this in the next monthly newsletter that goes out to them. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
It is Creative Commons licensed for re-use in teaching materials and elsewhere. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
So the CDA’s textual inconsistency only “strains credulity” if one completely ignores the legislative manufacturing process that created the CDA. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:26 am
Code § 230, which is part of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
Thus, the court summarizes: Given the clarity of the plain language of the amendment of the CDA, and the ambiguity of the legislative history relied upon by Plaintiff, the Court thus finds that the CDA does apply to state law civil sex trafficking claims A different court (ML v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
” [Cite to In re Zoom] Finally, the CDA does not require Stratics to distribute content over the internet. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
One was Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:28 am
” Thus, the district court concluded that “[d]efendants, when they re-published the matters in evidence, had the same duties and liabilities for re-publishing libelous material as the author of such materials. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:19 pm
The upshot was that the court held that, in fact, the CDA does not exempt the site from all that user-solicited content, and the lower court will have to take up the case again. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
At CDA, we wanted to acquire and distribute the data. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
Plaintiffs alleged that StubHub only offers to sell tickets for hot acts, thereby guaranteeing high commissions and ticket re-sale prices above the statutory limit. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Cisco supported the Office of President López Obrador by re-launching the TelePresence network that Cisco donated during the H1N1 crisis 11 years ago. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
Filer is not entitled to immunity under the CDA. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:51 am
Despite the flaws of the CDA and Section 230, anti-copyright activists in Canada, led by Michael Geist at the University of Ottawa, think it would be a good idea for Canada to have its own version of Section 230. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
Citing Furber and Shiamili, the court says "merely encouraging defamatory posts is not sufficient to defeat CDA immunity. [read post]
