Search for: "In Re CDA"
Results 141 - 160
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
What is the CDA? [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 10:01 am
If that’s where we’re headed, Section 230 is an appropriate and more efficient way of achieving the same outcome (see Doe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 6:35 am
While we’re on the subject of a “sum certain,” another issue that befuddles contractors is how to submit a claim when the changed work is not completed. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:04 am
They’re authorized to enforce forum rules and suspend posting privileges for rule violations. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
Reno (CDA I District Ct. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
We’re not talking about the free speech rights of a janitor with a mop. [read post]
30 May 2016, 6:01 am
Some localities intent on regulating room sharing don’t seem fully aware that “federal law — specifically CDA 230 — prevents any laws that look to hold internet platforms liable for the actions of their users. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:24 am
We’re the New York Times of the 21st century! [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
Re/code: Microsoft, Google agree to stop complaining to regulators about each other. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:27 am
The complaints allege that these services are slow to pull infringing content and, even when that content is pulled from a website, it reappears soon thereafter, being re-posted to those services once again. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
EFF supported the injunction as a measure necessary to nip the abusive use of a state official’s investigatory subpoena power in the bud, and we’re sorry to see the injunction overturned. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am
Because you know how “confusing” all that can be when you’re on national television at a public hearing. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:56 am
But Congress did not sound an uncertain trumpet when it enacted the CDA, and it chose to grant broad protections to internet publishers. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
Filer is not entitled to immunity under the CDA. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:18 am
They’re banal, boring and silly. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
While the case was not a “headliner” the Panel decision in Puerto Rico Regulations on the Import, Distribution and Sale of UHT Milk from Québec [USA-CDA-1993-1807-01] was important in demonstrating the application of a claim of “non-violation nullification or impairment” (“NVNI”). [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:29 pm
You're not real. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:21 pm
CDA 230 is a U.S. law. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
” Most ads are unread; most commercial mail is tossed out; people mute or skip TV commercials or go to the bathroom while they’re on; there’s even good evidence that our eyes skip over banner ads so well that most of us don’t even process their existence. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:32 am
True, and yet even the federal government does not always get it right, as in the case of the CDA. [read post]
