Search for: "In Re Holder" Results 141 - 160 of 7,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Not only is it criminal, but if you're caught, the next time you marry a U.S. citizen -- even if for real this time -- you're going to find it difficult to stay in the United States.And even the Ninth Circuit isn't going to be too upset about kicking you out. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
The first thing I notice is that the respondent's name is Holder, which means it's an immigration case, and the second thing I see is that Judge Reinhardt authors the majority opinion and Judge Bybee dissents. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:36 pm by Cara Gagliano
When something enters the public domain, you’re free to copy, share, and remix it without fear of a copyright lawsuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:34 am
  The former monopoly holder, IRB-Brasil Re reportedly made up more than 80% of this figure, followed by Munich Re (8.8%), JMalucelli Re (6.5%), XL Re (4.1%) and Mapfre Re (.3%).It is important to note that these figures do not include any earned premiums as to admitted and occasional foreign reinsurers.For a copy of the report or if you would be interested in learning more about the Brazilian and/or other Latin American… [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:52 am by Skier & Associates
Stake-holders there are being asked to submit their arguments in writing prior to the hearing. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:59 am by Ashby Jones
” So what accounts for Holder’s rather buoyant mood? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:02 am
In conjunction with its recent announcement of three new product lines for the Brazilian market, IRB-Brasil Re, the former reinsurance market monopoly holder, has indicated that it intends to continue to fight aggressively to protect its market share against the new crop of foreign competitors that have entered the Brazilian reinsurance market after its opening in April 2008.The three new products revolve around personal health and provide coverage for daily expenses during… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:35 am by Broc Romanek
In re Celera Corp.: Delaware Certifies Class Even Though Lead Plaintiff Sold Shares John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson notes: Here is Vice Chancellor Parsons' opinion in In re Celera Corp., in which he certified a class for settlement purposes and approved the settlement even though the lead plaintiff had sold its shares in the Celera before its merger with a subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics was completed. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:23 am
In re Palms Free Inc., Serial No. 86229868 (January 5, 2016) [not precedential].Based on dictionary definitions of "palm" ("[t]he inner surface of the hand that extends from the wrist to the base of the fingers) and "free" ("not subject to external restraint" and "not bound, fastened, or attached"), the Board concluded that, "when used in connection with a universal phone holder or harness, the term PALMS FREE means an unencumbered… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:44 pm by Steven Koprince
 The Ross Group Construction Corporation, which was a small business when it submitted its proposal on the MATOC, was one of the contract holders. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:00 am
That’s the weighty question keeping us up last night as we contemplated In Re Stephen Comiskey, the latest in a string of rulings that has chipped away at patent holders â [read post]