Search for: "In Re Murray"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2022, 7:02 am
" was a brilliant SNL sketch on a 1979 episode, with Bill Murray running a quiz show where the contestants were Gilda Radner and Ricky Nelson. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am
Worst of all, they also refused to divulge the purchase price–even though we're talking about public money. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:47 am
Murray knows there are 2 big differences. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:44 am
In other words, there may well be criminal investigations in which the expectation does not arise (the Supreme Court gave the example of public rioting, a behaviour which the court in In Re JR38 made clear Article 8 is not designed to protect). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 8:25 am
“We’re Doing S’mores”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast, featuring law professors Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, and Melissa Murray, via this link. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
Judgement was handed down in Sayed Zulfikar Abbas Bukhari v Syed Tauqeer Bukhari [2022] EWHC 173 (QB) on the 1 February 2022 by Murray J. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Just ask Laura Murray. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
The Privacy & Information Security Law Blog has published its analysis of the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) guidelines, published 12 January 2022, on the re-use of personal data by data processors for their own purposes (such as product improvement or the development of new products and services) under the GDPR. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
, heard on 27 July 2021 (Murray J) Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Hacked Off has re-published lessons from the phone hacking scandal: 10 years on, first published on Campaign.org. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
Last month, Justice Charles D. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 6:33 am
We're told the President "strongly supports" the legislation. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 8:45 am
Scholars like John McGinnis, Melissa Murray, and Mark Tushnet have wondered (without endorsement) if the Court might claim to do that by applying Casey's rule against "undue burdens" on abortion. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
The Panopticon Blog also has an article on the recent case of NHS Business Authority v Information Commissioner & Spivack [2021] UKUT 192 (AAC) and how the decision affects the problem data controllers encounter when principally anonymous datasets can re-identify data subjects when taken with other publicly available information. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 10:04 am
RE/MAX, LLC et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:28 am
This judgment Re Murray (deceased) Crummer v AAI Limited ABN 2020 QSC 155 dealt with the meaning of a householder’s liability policy exclusion for liability for death or injury of anyone who usually lives at the insured address. [read post]
