Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc." Results 141 - 160 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2015, 2:30 am by William Sinclair
In addition, the Firm has handled appeals in other state courts and various Federal courts, including cert. petitions to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 May 2015, 2:30 am by William Sinclair
In addition, the Firm has handled appeals in other state courts and various Federal courts, including cert. petitions to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:45 am by South Florida Lawyers
  We're talking things like summary judgment time periods, discovery methods, offers of judgment etc.? [read post]
3 May 2008, 8:05 am
You can find the opinion here, if you're interested. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In re: accessiBe Ltd., Docket No. 22-113 (Fed. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  The California Supreme Court doesn't feel that issue's sufficiently important to grant review.But the United States Supreme Court does. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:36 am by Florian Mueller
The very last section argues that Google's interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court was premature. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:26 am by Brandon Bartels
What is the primary function of an opinion (re: a guide for lower courts)? [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:03 am
  I'm supremely confident that it would be a good idea as a practical matter. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:01 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Donald Rehkopf, Esq (of the Firm of Brenna, Brenna, and Boyce) provides some useful information for those seeking to challenge those holdings:Just read your post from late January, RE: Melendez-Diaz, etc., on the NYCD blog - there's another reason to attack Meekins [and now Brown]. [read post]
And it’s a decision that the majority says, “Though there are all these huge implications, ethical, 14th amendment, etc., etc., we’re just looking at the statute. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:39 am by karp
Hodges, decided by the Supreme Court in 2015, legitimized same-sex marriage in all 50 states. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:45 pm by Andy Taylor
  This, in our opinion, is a positive move by the court. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 2:29 am
And if lower courts often ignore Supreme Court decisions and appellate authority, that may not be because they're rebelling or incompetent but because ostensibly controlling precedent was from an inapplicable context. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
The new scope of the exception after Marshall is best summed up by the following passage from Marshall: "when one court is exercising in rem jurisdiction over a res, a second court will not assume in rem jurisdiction over the same res. [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:54 am by Keith Lee
The entire transcript is a treasure trove of insight into the Justices’ opinions on legal writing. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:47 am by David Feldman
My favorite band, the Supremes (aka the US Supreme Court) tomorrow will release the most important decision they have rendered in decades, maybe only other than the seminal Bush v. [read post]