Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices." Results 141 - 160 of 14,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 11:35 am by Jillian C. York
Because they’re already so targeted, because they’re vilified already in the media by politicians and so on. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
And you're not proclaiming righteous opinions, you're exerting power, intimidating people. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
The Appellate Division last week in Behler v Tao (read here) affirmed the order below in a 3-2 decision featuring a majority opinion authored by Presiding Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, applying what she labels “explicitly contractarian” Delaware LLC law “sometimes leading to harsh results,” and a dissenting opinion authored by Justice Ellen Gesmer exalting “basic principles of contract law and fundamental fairness. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm by Josh Blackman
[It will be harder for conservative litigants in blue states and liberal litigants in red states to obtain statewide relief. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Simply “liking” or re-tweeting official policy is less likely to be seen as an official act. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
First, in front of a crowd comprising Wonka’s intrigued prospective customers, Slugworth declares his expert opinion: “Mr. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 11:28 am by Will Baude
(Or perhaps different justices who joined the unanimous majority read the Sixth Circuit's test differently, even as they all agree what the test should be.) [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:24 am by Amy Howe
One plaintiff, they note, was “censored” after she re-published a post by Robert F. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:33 pm by Gabriel Sutton
Here are some key mistakes to avoid when navigating this complex legal terrain, especially if you’re considering seeking justice in Texas. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
(I'll add that Justice Bromberg joins Justice Danner's opinion -- my, what an incredibly smart panel, by the way.) [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:46 pm
AI systems: deploying subliminal, manipulative, or deceptive techniques to distort behaviour and impair informed decision-making, causing significant harm.exploiting vulnerabilities related to age, disability, or socio-economic circumstances to distort behaviour, causing significant harm.biometric categorisation systems inferring sensitive attributes (race, political opinions, trade union membership, religious or philosophical beliefs, sex life, or sexual orientation), except… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:46 pm
Then Justice Goldman adds a brief three-page concurrence that suggests helpful ways that the parties can help assemble the record in such cases, with a suggestion that the Judicial Council get involved.All great thoughts.But everyone joins Justice Streeter's opinion, and everyone joins Justice Goldman's concurrence.So why not just issue one opinion with both thoughts? [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” This is, in fact, precisely how Justice Alito’s opinion in Brnovich v. [read post]