Search for: "In The Matter Of: N.A" Results 141 - 160 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, extrinsic evidence may not be considered where, as here, the contract is unambiguous (Matter of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 198 AD3d 156, 163 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 38 NY3d 998 [2022]). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, extrinsic evidence may not be considered where, as here, the contract is unambiguous (Matter of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 198 AD3d 156, 163 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 38 NY3d 998 [2022]). [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:59 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Conformity Overview Net Operating Loss (NOL) Deduction Under § 172 Business Interest Expense Limitation Under § 163(j) Paycheck Protection Program Income Exclusion and Expense Deduction Unemployment Compensation Tax Exclusion Conclusion Key Findings The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act made temporary structural changes to the federal tax code to enhance business liquidity, including more generous treatment of net… [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:04 am
For example, credit cards and car loans issued by national banking associations (they usually have "N.A. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
Citibank (S.D.), N.A., 517 U.S. 735, 745 (1996) (Scalia, J., for a unanimous Court) (looking to dictionaries from the era in which the statute was passed); St. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"a significant risk of substantial harm to the . . . safety of the employee or others" (9 NYCRR 466.11[g][2][I]; Executive Law §§ 292[21-e], 296[3][a]; Pimentel v Citibank, N.A., 29 AD3d 141, 145 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 707 [2006]). [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:54 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Showing that a party had no intent to perform "is not easy," as such matters are not usually susceptible to direct proof. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank, N.A. v Westwood, LLC, 115 AD3d 935, 937-938; Viafax Corp. v Citicorp Leasing, Inc., 54 AD3d at 850). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Even two years after enactment of the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), many states have yet to issue guidance explaining how they conform to key provisions of the law, particularly those pertaining to international income. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
., Bank One, N.A. f/k/a Bank One of Indiana, N.A., a 12-page decision, Judge Najam writes:Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court is empowered to determine whether defendant is liable to pay no-fault benefits (see Marangiello v Kamak, 64 AD2d 624, 625 [1978]), and whether plaintiff is a proper person to pursue that claim "is an issue separate from the subject matter of the action or proceeding, and does not affect the court's power to entertain the case before it" (Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v Mastropaolo, 42 AD3d 239, 243 [2007]; see Matter of Renee XX. v… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:45 pm by WIMS
The district court dismissed the contract claims, finding that the Subordinate Bondholders failed to obtain written consent of UMB Bank, N.A. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
Based upon this perspective, however, the Petitioners’ Brief points to Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]