Search for: "In re: Application to Issue Subpoena"
Results 141 - 160
of 716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
The number of pardons with a political sheen that Trump has signed, along with the unorthodox way he has wielded the power, may have desensitized the public to the issue. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:44 pm
You're instead left with the distinct impression that the County doesn't want the defendant to know how jurors are selected precisely because it's worried that they'll discover that the process does not, in fact, work the way it should.The whole "sunlight is the best disinfectant" principle seems quite applicable here. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 8:05 pm
The rule has also been changed to conform Rule 2004 with current Fed.R.Civ.P. 45 (made applicable in bankruptcy cases by Rule 9016), making clear that a subpoena under Rule 2004 is now properly issued from the court where the bankruptcy case is pending, and can be signed by an attorney authorized to practice in that court, even if the examination is to occur in another district. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Dunkins re. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
(In re Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings), 939 F.3d 710, 723 (6th Cir. 2019. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm
§ 1782(a), and the judge initially granted it and issued the requested subpoena. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Nonetheless, the recordings are recovered elsewhere, and they're not particularly helpful to the defense. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Nonetheless, the recordings are recovered elsewhere, and they're not particularly helpful to the defense. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
But Not Everyone Thinks They’re Broken. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:11 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesSeattle Police Department Subpoena for Protest CoverageDecision Date: July 31, 2020 The Seattle King County Superior Court granted an application by the City of Seattle’s Police Department (SPD) for a subpoena to obtain unpublished photos and video footage of protesters from five news media outlets. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Some aspects of this law are limited to the presidency or the United States government more broadly, while others are more broadly applicable. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
The court’s reasoning: In this particular case, the validity of the underlying subpoena was questionable. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm
In response to the recent protests and social unrest, there has been a renewed focus on equality and diversity issues. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 7:32 pm
The resolution of those questions in this case involves nothing more and nothing less than the application of neutral principles about which reasonable jurists on this court disagree. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 5:48 pm
If you overstep the bounds of relevancy or decency with your Notice To Produce, it is the opposing side’s burden to object or simply play dumb and say “not applicable” or “not available at this time. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
The firm issued subpoenas in May 2019 to NICD and other parties requesting the information and later filed an application to the High Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
Interrogatories are limited to 30 questions including subparts UNLESS they’re the Illinois Supreme Court Standard Interrogatories which have 27 questions and 100 sub-questions. [read post]
