Search for: "In re: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION"
Results 141 - 160
of 758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 5:27 pm
Moreover, in similar litigation in the Northern District of California, In re Facebook Privacy Litigation, the court was less amenable to treating users’ personal information stored on Facebook as valuable personal property (for an in-depth discussion of these two cases, see our June 2011 issue of Socially Aware). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
KEY SPEAKERS Debbie Carlos – Assistant General Counsel, Litigation – Sunoco Ralph Shalom – Associate General Counsel and Chief Litigation Officer – First Data Corporation Michael Klein – Assistant General Counsel – Altria Client Services Steven Greenspan, Associate General Counsel, Litigation – United Technologies Corporation Jocelyn Hunter – VP and Deputy General Counsel Benefits, Employment, Litigation,… [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:50 am
This principle was recently confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas in In re CTLI, LLC (Bankr. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Yesterday, the California Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection held a hearing on the California Consumer Privacy Act. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Other location privacy wins: Neal v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 8:35 am
Case citation: In re Wyze Data Incident Litigation, 2:20-cv-00282-JCC (W.D. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:30 pm
For example, major privacy scandals and data breaches haven’t caused many people to stop using Facebook, which is evidence of the social network’s monopoly power. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:06 am
” * In re: Marriott International Customer Data Security Breach Litig., 2022 WL 822925 (D. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:55 pm
[37] He went on to say that “[i]n litigation, particularly litigation between the executive and any of its manifestations and the citizen, the principle of open justice represents an element of democratic accountability, and the vigorous manifestation of the principle of freedom of expression. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 3:44 pm
Now Debbie has her own podcast, The Data Diva Talks Privacy. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:22 am
. ***** Lawyers, social media evidence and discovery obligations If you’re a litigator, you know as well as I do how important social media evidence has become in recent years. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Cal.: Facebook Posts are Electronic Mail Messages, Subject to CAN-SPAM -- Facebook v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 7:34 am
Facebook’s litigation strategy in this case – In re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation – appears to be based on the line of argument oft utilized with much success at the summary judgment stage in tracking cases (and privacy cases generally), that the plaintiff is not able to show how interception and collection of personal information/browsing history results in a cognizable or economic harm. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm
If you have used Google lately, you have likely seen the little banner popping up at the top of the page, announcing, “We’re changing our privacy policy and terms. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:10 am
Meanwhile, in the news roundup, Michael Weiner breaks down the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) (and the states’) long-awaited antitrust lawsuit against Facebook. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:05 am
But the debate ended when one of the execs opined, “We’re not here to promote American values. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:33 am
Facebook Gets Bad Ruling In Face-Scanning Privacy Case–In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation Employee Kvetching About Job On Facebook Still Entitled To Unemployment Benefits Facebook Can Legally Block Pages Without Any Explanation–Sikhs For Justice v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
The State Supreme Court disagreed because “basic concepts” such as Facebook’s “general privacy settings” are matters of ordinary knowledge that do not require expert testimony. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:37 am
Case citation: In re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation, 2015 WL 248334, MDL No. 2443 (SRC) (D.N.J. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:09 am
e-mail has been litigated. [read post]
